Dynamically Consistent Voting Rules ∗ Madhav

نویسنده

  • Madhav Chandrasekher
چکیده

This paper studies families of social choice functions (SCF’s), i.e. a collection of social choice functions {ΦA}, where the family is indexed by the option set of choices. These (sets of) functions arise in sequential choice problems where at each stage a set of options is given to a population of voters and a choice rule must aggregate stated preferences to generate an aggregate choice. In such settings, the aggregate decision-making process should reflect some form of consistency across choice problems. We characterize the class of (sequences of) SCF’s that satisfy two properties: (i) strategy-proofness and (ii) a notion of dynamic consistency inspired by Sen’s α from choice theory. When the aggregate choice is anonymous, this class turns out to be exactly the set of q-rules, i.e. rules in which the selected alternative is the most preferred alternative of the voter at the q-thN-tile of the population (whereN is the set of voters). This nests median voter schemes when no phantom voters are admitted in the decision rule. Without anonymity we obtain a class that we call “vote-by-committee” rules, the name due to some similarities with a class of SCF’s axiomatized in Barberá et al. (1991).

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Dynamically consistent voting rules

Many preference aggregation problems are not, by nature, one-shot. In these settings, voter preferences need to be repeatedly aggregated as a function of the underlying pool of options that are being voted over. For example, imagine that a firm votes an offer to a candidate. If the offer is declined, then the pool of options shrinks, votes are aggregated once more, and a subsequent offer is mad...

متن کامل

Consistent Approval-Based Multi-Winner Rules

This paper is an axiomatic study of consistent approval-based multi-winner rules, i.e., voting rules that select a fixed-size group of candidates based on approval ballots. We introduce the class of counting rules, provide an axiomatic characterization of this class and, in particular, show that counting rules are consistent. Building upon this result, we axiomatically characterize three import...

متن کامل

Dynamic stability and reform of political institutions

When are political institutions stable? When do they tend toward reform? This paper examines a model of dynamic, endogenous institutional change. I introduce a class of dynamic political games in which the political aggregation rules used at date t+1 are instrumental choices under rules at date t. A political rule is stable if it selects itself. A reform occurs when an alternative rule is selec...

متن کامل

Can Voting Solve the Information Problem in Large Elections?

Starting with Feddersen-Pesendorfer (1997), most of the work examining the question of information aggregation under strategic voting has assumed that as the state changes, everyone becomes more (or less) inclined towards one alternative (“common values”). We show that this assumption is necessary and su¢ cient in delivering the result that voting always aggregates information for any rule. We ...

متن کامل

Condorcet Consistent Bundling with Social Choice

We study the problem of computing optimal bundles given agents’ preferences over individual items when agents derive satisfaction from the entire bundle under constraints on the size k of the bundle. Building on the notion of Condorcet winning sets by Gehrlein [16], we extend common Condorcet consistent voting rules from the single winner voting setting to that of forming bundles of size k. Our...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013